I have always
been fascinated with architecture. As a kid,
I built an endless array of house and other building with Legos. This was when
Legos just consisted of blocks, doors, windows, and maybe a few wheels. Some of
this interest probably came from my father who was always building something,
including several houses. In 9th grade,
I took a drafting class because I thought it would be a good background for thinking about being an architect. It soon
became apparent that I could not draw a straight line with a ruler, let alone
anything complex. Maybe architecture was not to be my calling.
Years later,
as I began my library career I discovered I had a good sense of space; an
ability to look at a space and envision it in different ways. In all of my
library jobs, I soon found myself making
suggestions to re-arrange furniture, shelving, or in one case the layout of the
entire library. These were good skills
but were done in the era before there was
significant research about learning space design or how the arrangement of furniture,
spaces, etc. affected how students learned.
During my
career at Colby College, I had a
multitude of opportunities to think about library architecture. I inherited a
library building that was both iconic and terrible in its design. The original
building, modeled after Independence
Hall, was designed by Jens Frederick Larson. It quickly became Colby’s iconic
building. A modernist red brick barn addition was added to the back of the
building in 1983. In and of itself the modernist structure was not bad, but in
adding the addition, the architects destroyed almost all the historic interior
of the original building, including the grand entrance, and the reading room.
The two structures co-existed but did not work well together. It quickly became
my goal to restore some of the original building’s grandeur, including the
grand entrance and historic reading room.
For my
sabbatical in 2009, I went to Australia
and New Zealand to visit university libraries with the specific intent of
looking at the intersection of technology, space, and services. Libraries down
under were early adopters of learning commons, shared reference/IT service
desks, and a furniture style which I dubbed as “alone together”. In 2010 I
visited 17 university libraries in the UK, again looking at the intersection of
technology, space, and services. The UK libraries also had innovative learning
commons, technology-enabled services, and
spaces that catered to student needs in ways that were more obvious than many
US libraries at that time.
In 2012 on a
trip to Berlin, I visited the Philological Library at the Free University of
Berlin. Designed by Sir Norman Foster (Foster and Partners – UK), the library
is shaped inside and out like a human brain. The design inside, shows two
distinct hemispheres and the seating areas undulate around the outside edge
with easy access to the collection directly behind the user. The library only supports
quiet contemplative study but none of the creative synergy of groups, or
creative work that modern technology affords. Libraries support both right and left-brain
work. The brain metaphor, while quite interesting, is not completely borne out
by the building’s architecture.
As libraries
have transitioned from being predominantly collection centered to user-centered, library architecture has become,
in my opinion, more interesting. More time is being spent on thinking about how
students use the building and how furniture, lighting, and aesthetics support
different learning and social behaviors. New modes of information delivery, new
technologies, and new types of pedagogy and scholarship have also influenced
building design.
Rethinking
libraries and library space is
challenging. Almost everyone who uses a library has an opinion on what a
library is, what it should contain, and how it should be organized. Classroom
faculty’s thoughts on libraries are formed by their own academic experience as
well as by their discipline and its ways of using information. Students’ views
of libraries are influenced by their own experience or lack thereof with
libraries in their schools or in their communities as well as by their
experience with mobile technologies. Librarians, of course, have their own varied
views of libraries. Academic administrators, who have broad concerns about
space needs, student success, as well as faculty scholarship and research needs,
represent yet another view of libraries.
In thinking
about the 21st-century
library, especially from a design/architectural perspective, architects and librarians
must balance these competing concerns, interests, needs, as well as the institutional mission, in developing a vision
for the library building. Because building costs are always an issue, it is easy
for administrators to overlook or minimize the very important role that
aesthetics play in learning. While students are certainly interested in having
space to do their work, they have very real expectations of and need for nice
furniture, good use of color, natural light, and art as well as easy access to
collections, and technology. We should pay attention to each of the following.
Art: Libraries, in my opinion, serve as the hub of intellectual discourse, creative
curiosity, and a venue for learning and scholarship; scholarship that goes
beyond writing and research to include the scholarship of creation and
performance. Having art in the library is an important part of the cultural and
aesthetic mission of the library. Art not only provides an opportunity to
expose students to art as a historic and
cultural expression, but the presence of art also
reinforces the creative role that libraries play in the creation of new
knowledge.
Libraries
should include art (paintings, drawings, photographs, sculptures) but also provide
spaces and technologies that facilitate the creation
of art. While there is no set program for what art should be included, it is
helpful, when possible to include some art that represents the cultural
heritage of the students that the library serves. Providing a space or program
that student art can be exhibited on a regular basis also reinforces the
libraries creative role.
Examples of
libraries which have a strong art presence are Grand Valley State’s Mary Idema
Pew Library and Los Angeles Public Library.
Figure 1. Art at Grand Valley State University’s Mary Idema Pew Library - Courtesy of Corey Seeman - (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) |
Figure 2. Murals at Los Angeles Public Library - Oaxacan artist collective Tlacolulokos – Photo by Clem Guthro |
Color: I have visited too many libraries where the
predominant color palette is white/eggshell/light beige or some equally bland color. From my experience, the “lack of color” usually comes from facilities
management which supports a limited color palette, rather than from architects
or designers. There is significant research that shows how color affects
learning but also how color can be used to set the mood or expectations of how
a particular space is to be used. While there may be a temptation to use the
universities official colors as the color palette, this should be resisted as
the colors may not fit the purpose. University logo and some university colors
can be incorporated for things like donor walls or other official purposes.
Many public
libraries are leading the way in the use of color. Madison Public Library (WI)
and Hastings Public Library (NE) are two examples of color that comes from
paint, furniture, and fixtures.
Figure 3. Madison Public Library - http://photo-tour-madisons-central-library/
|
Figure 4 Hastings Public Library - Clark Enersen Partners - https://www.aia.org/showcases/187046-hastings-public-library-renovationaddition |
Natural Light: The use of
large amounts of natural light is one of the predominant changes that has taken
place as libraries have moved away from being primarily focused on the print
collection. The brutalist buildings with few windows, the gun fortress
buildings with their 6-inch-wide windows, buildings with no windows, are being
renovated or replaced with structures that make significant use of natural
light. North Carolina State’s Hunt Library with its majority glass walls is a
stunning example of the transformational power of natural light to a space that
is intended for working, studying, and creating. Likewise, Goucher College’s Athanaeum shows the power of glass to transform
the exterior of the building as well.
Figure 5. Hunt Library - North Carolina State University - Courtesy of Mal Booth - (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) |
Figure 6. Goucher College Athenaeum - George Sexton Associates - http://www.gsadc.com/goucher-college-athenaeum/ |
Furniture: I will admit that I am a bit of
a library furniture junkie. At every American Library Association conference,
you can always find me at the Exhibit Hall giving some of the latest furniture
a test drive. I usually come home with one or more furniture brochures and some
pictures.
Library
furniture has come a long way since the Soviet-style
metal carrels and inflexible plastic chairs of the 60’s. The wooden library
tables that are reminiscent of the historic library tables are popular again,
especially in historic reading rooms. Outside of a nod to past history, there
are new individual workspaces, collaborative media spaces, and group study spaces, all created with an
attention to the user’s needs and how they best learn. Steelcase, Agati, and
Shapes and Surfaces provide some great examples of the newest offerings.
Figure 7. Brody Worklounge - Steelcase - https://www.steelcase.com/products/desks/brody/#specifications_product-range |
Figure 8. Agati Media Station - https://www.agati.com/product-type/media-stations/ |
TV programs,
movies, theatre productions all employee lighting engineers who play a critical
role in their success. No producer or director would want to mount a production
without well-qualified lighting
professionals. While we see the role of the lighting engineer as essential for
Hollywood, it is equally interesting that we have paid significantly less
attention to the lighting in our academic libraries, given the strategic
importance of libraries to student success, and the long-term nature of a
library building.
Lighting in
today’s academic libraries should be exceptional and fit to purpose whether it
is to provide illumination for reading, writing, talking to your friends,
working on a group project, or trying to find a book in the stacks. Great
lighting not only facilitates the activities that we want our users to be able
to do, but it also sets the mood, helps define
the space, and gives users a sense of how the
space should be used. On the flip side, bad lighting can discourage use
through eye strain, headaches, and providing an ambiance that does not
encourage study, reflection, creation, and discourse.
Figure 10. Lighting in Princeton's Firestone Library - http://www.lampartners.com/portfolio/princeton-firestone-library/ |
Technology:
Technology is pretty ubiquitous in today’s libraries. Some of it is provided by
the library and much is carried in by students. While in many libraries we are
still seeing large installed groups of PCs and Macs, the more interesting
technologies being seen are the technologies of makerspaces, virtual reality,
and large-scale digital visualization. These technologies are part of the new
tools of scholarship that libraries are facilitating. Of course, these
technologies require new spaces, new computer technologies, and an abundance of
electrical outlets to power all of the pieces. Interesting examples of these
technologies can be seen in University of Texas at Arlington Libraries’ FabLab,
Georgia State University Libraries’ Curve, and University of Oklahoma Libraries’
Innovation @ the Edge.
Figure 14. Makerspace. University of Texas at Arlington FabLab - https://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/139392.php |
Figure 15. CURVE Data Visualization Wall - Georgia State University Libraries - http://sites.gsu.edu/curve/interactwall/ |
Figure 16. Virtual Reality stations at University of Oklahoma
Libraries - https://campustechnology.com/Articles/2018/01/31/A-Hub-for-Innovation-and-Learning.aspx?Page=2
No comments:
Post a Comment