I have
always been a reader. I regularly hear that being a librarian must be the
perfect profession because librarians get to read all day. The reality, however,
usually is more like seeing thousands of books I want to read and maybe getting
to read one or two.
Not working
full-time for the past 16 months has had one major privilege; the opportunity to
read voraciously. To say I have eclectic reading tastes in an understatement. I
get my reading lists from wandering through bookstores, combing through lists
like “ What Columbia University Business School professors are reading this
summer”, New York Times bestseller lists, and browsing through library
catalogs. A big thanks and a shout out to the Los Angeles Public Library and
their fabulous collection for providing copies of the books that interest me.
These 17
non-fiction titles, along with 14 novels, are the books I’ve read during
June/July 2019
Ron Chernow.
Washington a Life
Mona
Hanna-Attisha. What
the Eyes Don’t See: A Story Of Crisis, Resistance, And Hope In An American City
Lindsey
Hilsum. In
Extremis: The Life of War Correspondent Marie Colvin
Khalil
Gibran Muhammad. The
Condemnation of Blackness: Race, Crime, and the Making of Modern Urban America
Michelle
Obama. Becoming
Susan
Orlean. The
Library Book
Anne
Gardiner Perkins. Yale Needs Women: How
the First Group of Girls Rewrote the Rules of an Ivy League Giant
Eric Rutkow.
The Longest Line on
the Map: The United States, the Pan-American Highway, and the Quest to Link the
Americas
Adam
Rutherford. A
Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived: The Human Story Retold Through Our
Genes
Norma
Stevens & Steven Aronson: Avedon:
Something Personal
Keeanga-Yamahtta
Taylor. How We Get Free: Black
Feminism and the Combahee River Collective
Tara
Westover. Educated
Each title
has informed my understanding of the world but more importantly has challenged
my beliefs and my ways of knowing/understanding people and culture. Reading
challenges my own understanding of epistemology.
I first encountered
the concept of epistemology in an introductory Philosophy course during my
first semester of university. Basically, epistemology is
the study of the nature of knowledge and how we know. Since the rise of the Age
of Reason during the 17th century, much of the Western epistemological
framework has been based on rationalism, rather than feelings/emotions, our
senses, or religion. While this rationalistic epistemology strengthened the
role of science and fact-based inquiry and dominated the universities,
religious and cultural epistemology did not disappear. Many people continued to
frame their way of looking at the world through a cultural and religious
epistemological lens; sometimes also embracing parts of rational epistemology,
sometimes eschewing it.
There is a
battle over epistemological frameworks in today’s society. The rise of fake
news and the rejection of scientific proof around issues like climate change
and medicine represent a rejection of a rational epistemology in favor of any
number of cultural, personal, or religious epistemologies. The epistemology we
adopt frames our ways of looking at others, at culture, at politics, and at
science. We may consciously or unconsciously espouse an epistemology of
oppression that marginalizes others.
As I have
pondered these issues through the lens of what I have been reading, I think
that our epistemological frameworks can be challenged and changed through
reading and critical reflection. Reading can be a radical act because it can
challenge our epistemological frameworks. It can and should cause us to stop
and ask, “why do I see others [insert any group, race, ability, orientation,
etc. here] in this particular way?” Why do I see them as less than me? Why
would I consider causing them harm? Why do I see my way of framing the world as
superior/correct and theirs as inferior/wrong? Reading can help us understand
the historical and cultural context for the past but also provide us the
freedom to break from that context to make the world different going forward. Reading
can help us surface epistemologies of oppression.
One of the
values that academic libraries can bring to the intellectual discourse on campus
is to purchase books that inform, challenge, and motivate; books that go beyond
mere support for the curriculum to books that provide intellectual collisions.
Rather than just shelving these titles in the stacks, libraries must look for
ways to engage the community through reading and dialogue. Libraries must
become active partners in providing the campus a place and resources for
intellectual dialogue, engagement, and critical reflection.
The
Brazilian educator and philosopher, Paulo Freire, felt that the purpose of
reading was to allow us to “read the world”, to interrogate it for meaning in
order to understand the world.
Put your
understanding of epistemology on an intellectual collision course. Read some
books that challenge your world view!